There are many views on the question of whether or not a writer needs an agent to make a first sale. Some people think a new writer’s energy is best spent on submitting directly to publishers. Others feel that, with more and more publishers closing their doors to unagented submissions, a new writer stands a better chance if she seeks an agent first. (For the record, I think that if you want to sell a book to one of the large publishing houses, you’re best off looking for an agent. Here’s why.)
But there’s no disagreement on the fact that after that first sale is made, a good agent is a tremendous boon to a writer’s career. Agents have industry contacts and inside knowledge that most writers don’t possess. They keep current with editors’ tastes and needs, know when new imprints are starting up and when established ones are downsizing, stay abreast of changing corporate policies, keep track of who’s newly hired and who just got fired or laid off. They negotiate advances and publishing contracts to their clients’ advantage, and are experienced in marketing subsidiary rights. Just as important, agents serve as writers’ advocates in the increasingly complex and competitive world of publishing.
There are many successful literary agents who provide excellent representation to their clients. Unfortunately, there are also many dishonest and incompetent ones, who relieve writers of money and waste their time–and sometimes damage careers by squandering submission opportunities or brokering contracts with bad publishers. A few decades ago, such agents weren’t terribly common. These days, due to changes in the publishing industry that have made agents the principal gatekeepers of the publishing world, they are legion.










